ED Raids Anil Ambani: On July 24, 2025, the Enforcement Directorate (ED) launched a series of raids across Mumbai and Delhi, targeting properties linked to Reliance Group chairman Anil Ambani. The operation, tied to an alleged Rs 3,000 crore loan fraud case involving Yes Bank, has sent shockwaves through India’s corporate world. As someone following the news, it’s hard not to feel intrigued by the scale of this investigation. Let’s break down what’s happening, why it matters, and what it means for Anil Ambani and his business empire.
Table of Contents
The Raids: What Happened?
The ED swooped in on over 35 locations, covering more than 50 companies and 25 individuals, under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA). The raids stem from two FIRs filed by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI), which flagged serious financial irregularities in Ambani’s Reliance Anil Dhirubhai Ambani Group (RAAGA) companies. The focus is on loans worth Rs 3,000 crore, allegedly diverted between 2017 and 2019. According to sources, the ED is investigating a “well-planned scheme” to siphon off public money by misleading banks, shareholders, and investors. The visuals of ED teams outside Reliance Centre in Mumbai have been all over the news, making it clear this is no small matter.
Allegations of Fraud and Bribery
At the heart of the investigation is the suspicion of illegal loan diversions and bribery. The ED claims that Yes Bank’s promoters, including former chairman Rana Kapoor, received funds in their personal accounts just before approving massive loans to RAAGA companies. This raises red flags about a possible quid pro quo. The agency also found issues like backdated credit approval documents, loans to financially weak companies, and a lack of proper due diligence. These violations suggest a deliberate attempt to bypass banking norms, which hits hard when you think about the trust people place in financial institutions.
Reliance Home Finance Under the Scanner
A key focus of the probe is Reliance Home Finance Limited (RHFL), a RAAGA company. According to a SEBI report, RHFL’s corporate loan portfolio skyrocketed from Rs 3,742 crore in FY 2017-18 to Rs 8,670 crore in FY 2018-19. This dramatic jump has raised eyebrows, with investigators pointing to “irregular and expedited approvals” and poor documentation. It’s unsettling to think how such a rapid increase in lending could go unchecked, and it makes you wonder about the oversight within these companies. The ED is digging deep to uncover whether these loans were funneled to shell companies or other group entities.
SBI’s Fraud Tag and Its Fallout
Just days before the raids, the State Bank of India (SBI) labeled Reliance Communications (RCom), another Ambani-led company, and Anil Ambani himself as “fraud” accounts. This followed a 2020 forensic audit that uncovered fund diversions. SBI’s exposure to RCom includes Rs 2,227 crore in principal and Rs 786 crore in bank guarantees, which is a massive financial burden. The fraud tag isn’t new—SBI had flagged RCom back in 2020—but this renewed scrutiny adds pressure on Ambani. It’s tough to imagine the stress of being under such intense regulatory fire, especially with your reputation on the line.
What’s Next for Anil Ambani?
The raids are just the beginning. The ED is continuing its interrogations and evidence collection to establish the full extent of the alleged fraud. Reliance Power and Reliance Infrastructure, two RAAGA companies, issued statements clarifying they’re not directly linked to the probed entities like RCom or RHFL. Still, their shares dropped up to 5% after the news broke, showing how investor confidence can waver. Ambani’s legal team argues he was only a non-executive director at RCom, with no role in daily operations, and cites protections under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code. But with SEBI previously banning Ambani from securities markets for five years over RHFL issues, the road ahead looks rocky. This saga raises questions about accountability in corporate India and whether Ambani can navigate this storm.
As the investigation unfolds, it’s a stark reminder of how complex and high-stakes the world of corporate finance can be. For now, all eyes are on the ED and what they uncover next. What do you think about this case? It’s a lot to take in, and I’m curious to see how it plays out.